(Written January of 2006)
It kills me to watch the Philadelphia 76ers play the type of basketball they’re playing. It seriously kills me. As a self-proclaimed NBA junkie, I can’t tell you the amount of nights I’ve been given ulcers due to losses in close games, been threatened with documentations for furious spats of swearing or the countless self inflicted suicide wounds after watching Samuel Dalembert shoot a jump shot.
It seems now that every time I tune in to watch a Sixers’ game, I make a check list of the things I can almost guarantee happening:
1: Mo Cheeks hopping and shuffling along the sidelines, clapping his hands and trying to pump up his team circa a 1970’s version of Larry Brown. The classic 70’s power mustache only backs up my theory that Cheeks has either watched Boogie Nights too many times or likes Burt Reynolds much differently than in just a manly appreciation.
2: Samuel Dalembert getting in foul trouble. Again. Is it just me or does Dalembert look like a beaten dog every time Cheeks pulls him because of foul trouble? What really gets me is the “stunned” look he shoots the referees every time he rips another man’s arm off. Seriously, why even bother? Dalembert fouls out of 20% of his games and he continually appeals to the refs as if they just read O.J.’s court verdict for the first time. Sammy, it isn’t exactly the ending of
“The Crying Game” every time you foul out of a game, sorry, don’t look so shocked.
3: Watch as Chris Webber limps down the court like a crippled gazelle. I understand that Webber isn’t the player he used to be. I know that injuries happen and that you’re never quite 100% again. Knowing all that though, it’s absolutely painful to watch him move around the court. Is this a geriatric home or an NBA game?
Here’s the tragedy within the 76ers organization – they’re a team too good to get a lottery draft pick, and therein build for their future, but they’re not nearly good enough to be contenders in the Eastern Conference. Right now it’s almost a ‘damned if you do, damned if you don’t’ type of scenario. If the Sixers play great basketball for the rest of the season, win the weak Atlantic Division and secure a 3 seed in the playoffs, they still won’t go far. They’ll probably take the first round, but drop the second, because they’re not as consistent as the probable number 4 seed, the Cleveland Cavaliers – and that’s saying something. The Cavs have “Mr. Clutch” himself, LeBron James, and as long as he doesn’t have to make a potential game-winning basket (which, we know by now, he’ll miss) he’ll lead his team, which is better all-around, to a victory. (About LeBron for a second, did anyone see the game against Denver where he missed the game-tying free throw? Poor guy looked like a little girl with a skinned knee after just finding out she was adopted.)
Defensively, the Sixers have more holes than Shawn Kemp has illegitimate children. Lord knows the 76ers don’t play defense (they allow 102 points per game, third worst in the NBA) and against team that rebounds as well as the Cavs do, they’d most likely be torched nightly on second chance points. Speaking of which, rebounding is a lost art in Philadelphia, as they consistently get beaten on the boards. Kyle Korver, who can shoot the three with the best of them, can’t defend worth a lick and makes even the simplest things, like boxing out, seem like he’s figuring out where Jimmy Hoffa’s body is buried.
On the other hand, they could, possibly, continue down their miserable path of inconsistency, miss the playoffs entirely and qualify for a lottery pick, although it’s not likely. This can help them build for the future, but, seriously, what fan wants to watch his team drop game after game? This is probably the worst of all the scenarios, as not only do Sixers fans lose out, but Allen Iverson and Chris Webber get another year older. Iverson may be able to hold up for a few more years playing at the level he is, but Webber is losing his wrestling match with Father Time and he’ll quickly become even less mobile than he is now. He already looks like a wounded animal trying desperately to get away from a predator when he’s driving into the lane, what’s going to happen when he adds on another few years of abuse and strain on his bum knee?
So far, both scenarios seem less inviting than Kobe Bryant at a day care center, so what’s left? There is a third option and with the trade deadline slowly creeping up on us, this is a perfect time for them to start evaluating their assets. What I’m about to suggest, from a fan point of view, I hate. I’m disgusted that I’ve even allowed myself to come to this conclusion, but I really don’t see any other way. The Sixers have to trade Allen Iverson.
Blasphemy? Nearly. Disloyalty at its finest? Absolutely. Beneficial? Definitely. Before you crucify me and sentence me to a fate worse than that of Ben Affleck’s career post-Gigli, hear me out. I love Iverson. I love watching him, I love how he gives it his all every night on the hardwood and I love how he values winning above all else. He’s the only Philly athlete fans have never booed and there’s a reason for it – he’s unbelievable loyal. The problem is, Iverson’s style of play, as dominating as it can be, just does not fit well with the rest of the Sixers team.
Think about it. When the Sixers made the NBA Finals in 2001, they did it with Iverson as their star and scorer and Larry Brown as their head coach, but what about the rest of the squad? They were role players. George Lynch, Eric Snow, Tyrone Hill, just to name a few. The 2001 76ers were filled to the brim with role players, because that’s the best way to compliment Iverson’s game. Let him do the majority of the scoring, take as many shots as he wants, and let all the other players do the dirty work. Iverson isn’t selfish, that’s just his style of play and how he performs the best. The role players never grumbled or complained about not getting shots, because they didn’t have star egos.
Look at the current Sixers roster – Korver, Iguodala, Webber, Dalembert. Which one of these doesn’t belong? Not only is Webber past his prime and ridiculously overpaid (20 million a year, which is, by the way, more than Iverson makes), but he’s already whining in the club house like a pregnant woman in her third trimester. After the 76ers got blown out by the Wizards a few weeks ago, Webber reportedly went off in the club house afterwards, yelling at the coaches and players alike about him, essentially, not getting the ball enough. Shortly after, Iverson sat in front of the media questioning his role on the team, clearly demoralized by Webber’s antics. A.I. has already said this is the most frustrating season of his career, but questioning his role on the team? I can’t ever remember that happening. Webber and Iverson aren’t winning consistently as is (a perfectly mediocre 21-21 as of the writing of this article), so what happens when you sprinkle in a further break down of team chemistry between the squad’s two star players? I think Eagles’ fans got plenty of that this season. Well, what about money? The argument used to be that Iverson sold tickets and put butts in the seats. I’m sure he still does, but so does winning. Also, have you seen a home Sixers’ game as of late? The place isn’t exactly as packed as an open bar at a Kennedy family wedding. People are losing interest and something needs to be done about it. Mediocrity does not sell tickets.
This is kind of like a bad high school science class – we’ve identified the problem, found the error in the formula, but how do we correct it? Why not just unload Webber if he’s causing problems with the team’s champion? Yeah, have a good time with that. You’ll have as much trouble trying to unload Webber for something valuable as Isiah Thomas would have being somewhat competent as an NBA GM. Like I said earlier, not only is Webber well past his prime, but he has a monster contract that won’t expire until 2008, where he’ll be making 22 million. If 76ers GM Billy King managed to somehow pull the wool over the eyes and get rid of Webber and his contract (you never know, the Knicks and Hawks didn’t get this bad purely by chance), they’d still have to get someone equally valuable or more so to be a true contender and even then it’d be a stretch. If, in that unlikely scenario, that were to happen, you’d still have the problem of Iverson playing with other scorers such as Kyle Korver and John Salmons, the former of which couldn’t guard an NBA forward well with a crowbar. The defensive problems would still go unsolved and Iverson’s play would still not be maximized for efficiency.
This is where I came to the dead end. This is where you have to trade Philadelphia icon Allen Iverson in order to be competitive not only now, but especially down the stretch. Iverson carries an incredible reputation around the NBA and could get great market value in return, as well as freeing up a lot of cap space. If you trade Iverson now, while you could get something great in return, you could grab a high profile, young point guard in return, as well as a real solid additional player or two.
First, you’d need to find a team capable of taking on Iverson’s contract before even looking at personnel. When coming to the dead end, the team that stuck out most to me was the New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets, a team with veteran role players (George Lynch, PJ Brown) and a few stunning young talents. PG Chris Paul and PF David West are the two names that stuck out to me the most and for good reason: This is Paul’s rookie season and he’s already lighting it up, averaging 16 points a game, 7 assists and nearly 6 boards a game, and 2.2 steals a game, all rookie highs except for rebounding, where he’s third. He’s only 20 years old. Paul is a great court leader, has a high basketball I.Q. and is a great defender off the ball. At 6’0’’, he may be a bit small for a point guard, but we’ve dealt with Iverson’s height issues for years, so it’s neither an upgrade nor a downgrade. Despite being vertically challenged, Paul has got a bright, bright career ahead of him. New York Knicks coach and NBA legend Larry Brown spoke of Paul after he single handedly demolished his New York Knicks a few weeks ago, saying “He’s one of the best to come into this league in a long, long time…he reminds me so much of Isiah.” Isiah, obviously, being Isiah Thomas, one of the greatest point guards in NBA history (in my opinion second only to Magic).
David West is a totally different case altogether. West had a strong rookie year in 2003-2004, but was injured for half of last season. When he did come back, he wasn’t the same player. He hung around the perimeter, hurting his offensive rebounding which is one of the best points in his game, and took jump shots out of his range. This, ultimately, dropped his market value. However, based on his rookie season and this year’s performance thus far (17 points and 8 boards a game), he still comes across as a solid pick up. If these two were picked up in a package deal for Iverson, Paul could take over duties from the point and develop along with the rest of the young Sixers line up and West could be groomed as Webber’s heir apparent at the power forward position.
The Sixers would then be in position to build your team for the future around Andre Iguodala, as well as the other young players on the team in Dalembert, Salmons and Korver and have a great shot in the future for something really special. Iguodala, at 21 years old, is an absolute physical freak. He’s fantastic defensively and has tremendous potential. If he furthers develops his mid-range jump shot as he gets older, he could be a devastatingly special player. Iguodala really reminds me of a top-tier player, almost like a Tracy McGrady, before he put it all together and figured it out, minus the ego problem and stupid Adidas commercials. If you don’t trade A.I. and ride the season out, he gets another year older, Webber gets more frustrated, and the team wastes another year of retooling possibilities.
Obviously, this trade would only fly if the Hornets were interested, which I think they would be. The Hornets are absolutely desperate for ticket sales and few things will boost sales like trading for Allen Iverson. Grabbing AI also instantaneously makes them a better team in the now. Surrounded by role players and guys willing to grab the tough boards and do the dirty work, AI and the Hornets could do very well for a few seasons.
As a fan, I don’t want to get rid of Iverson. I think he’s the heart and soul of the team, leaves it all out on the floor every night, and is one of the few players in NBA history I don’t think we’ll ever quite see another one like again. Unfortunately, the heart and soul can’t function without the body doing all the other things, something he just doesn’t have right now.